» Prophet-Minded

Prophet-Minded

The Australian Business Review Weekly ran a feature on Pentecostalism last week entitled “Prophet-Minded”.

I responded with a letter to the editor. I’m not sure if they’ll publish it. But here it is anyway.

Adele Ferguson’s article on the rise of the Pentecostal churches (May 26) could have benefited from the perspective of history. Renewal movements such as Pentecostalism are the stuff of church history. These movements always begin on the fringe of society. The successful ones eventually move into centre.

Take the Quakers of 17th and 18th century Britain. They began as a “dangerous” protest movement against the established churches. Thousands of them were jailed for disrupting Sunday services. One of their leaders even rode naked through a town as a sign of God’s judgement. Just a generation later Quakers were domininating the British steel industry, founding Lloyds of London and Barclay’s Bank, and producing Rowntree’s and Cadbury’s chocolates. Not only that, they led British society in prison reform, industrial relations and women’s rights.

Dig around the history of most established churches and you’ll find a similar pattern in their emergence. Australian Pentecostals began on the fringe and now they are moving to the mainstream of our culture. They will make their contribution just as other churches have done.

History reassures those who are troubled by zealous faith. Once the prosperous Quakers moved into the mainstream their children and grandchildren became respectable and sedate. Things quietened down until eventually the Methodists and then the Salvation Army came along and the story continued.

Steve Addison

2 Responses to “Prophet-Minded” »»

  1. Comment by Alister Cameron | 06/17/05 at 2:02 pm

    OK I’ll bite!!

    I haven’t read the article yet, but I keep hearing it’s pretty shocking stuff.

    What I would be interesting in hearing others’ opinions about is the sense of rightness or wrongness of a church movement/denomination engaging in commercial activities as an aspect of their core ministries or functions. Is it the place of a church to grow to the extent where, from a “business motive” point of view, it makes sense to engage in consolidated buying, or similar activities on behalf of members?

    Say the AOGs came out with a low-interest VISA card, or the products that they presently have like superannuation, car fleet, etc. How to we “theologise” about the church/commerce “divide”? Is it a problem to people?

    What if the Uniting Church came out with a member loyalty program where they “weilded” their buying power to create great deals on cars, petrol, flowers, books, etc for members? This is commerce and quite a product to maintain… could this be legitimate?

    What’s out there in terms of people’s thinking/writing about this stuff? I’m really interested in it, for one.

    A narrow view of “church” would preclude any commercial engagement perhaps, with the argument that it is “unequal yolking” with the world, perhaps. A more liberal view would think it’s just being smart!

    I am still really processing all this and would be interested in comments here from people who had really thought it through.

    – Alister

  2. Comment by Rick Paynter | 06/23/05 at 8:55 pm

    Interesting views Alister. I personally don’t make any divide between sacred and secular when it comes to the “activities” of the church. I do this because I contend a) we have to be in the world and that requires commerce (every church now exiting does this, even the Amish), b) there should be no place where God is not represented. I think those who say the church has no place in the world are in danger of not understanding why Jesus created it in the 1st place.

Leave a Reply »»

Google
  Web   SteveAddison.net
Subscribe with My Yahoo! Subscribe in NewsGator Online Subscribe with Bloglines