<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Notes for the Panel</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.steveaddison.net/2005/06/29/notes-for-the-panel.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.steveaddison.net/2005/06/29/notes-for-the-panel.html</link>
	<description>Steve Addison's blog about movements for the renewal and expansion of the church.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 19:31:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Pacific Highlander &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Dangerous Stories</title>
		<link>http://www.steveaddison.net/2005/06/29/notes-for-the-panel.html#comment-374</link>
		<dc:creator>Pacific Highlander &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Dangerous Stories</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2006 09:42:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steveaddison.net/2005/06/25/notes-for-the-panel.html#comment-374</guid>
		<description>[...] I attended the forum on the future of the Church, with Michael Frost, Ruth Powell (NCLS), Tom Sine, Carolyn Kitto and Steve Addison. The most interesting comment came from Steve, responding to unease about the success of the Pentecostals. He suggested that from his studies of similar movements in history, the future leaders of the AOG and their peers are likely to mellow out and provide a mainstream contribution to the future of Australia. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I attended the forum on the future of the Church, with Michael Frost, Ruth Powell (NCLS), Tom Sine, Carolyn Kitto and Steve Addison. The most interesting comment came from Steve, responding to unease about the success of the Pentecostals. He suggested that from his studies of similar movements in history, the future leaders of the <span class="caps">AOG</span> and their peers are likely to mellow out and provide a mainstream contribution to the future of Australia. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brigid Walsh</title>
		<link>http://www.steveaddison.net/2005/06/29/notes-for-the-panel.html#comment-66</link>
		<dc:creator>Brigid Walsh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2005 20:44:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steveaddison.net/2005/06/25/notes-for-the-panel.html#comment-66</guid>
		<description>Steve, love the concept of "engaged orthodoxy".  This has it in a nutshell.  For myself, forget whether the emerging church is a movement or not.  Time will tell and others will have the say.  If the focus shifts to whether the emerging church is a "movement" the eye goes off the ball and turns inward - next thing it will be about how the movement should survive, etc ad nauseam.  500 people at the weekend was pretty wonderful - the goal should be to network and encourage those people who attended.  These are the leaven in the lump, the salt to give savour - these are the ones who can make the difference.  And if they do make the difference - well, how mindblowing is that.  Let's not talk about where the world will be in a decade or two or three.  We don't have much of a clue.  So much that has affected our loves in recent decades could not have been predicted and that which was indicated was unclear in its shape, form and impact.  Talk about getting it right and how we can sustain people and message in the changing dynamic is more to the point.  The concept of DNA transmission is vital.  As we look back over two millenia we can see how much the emphasis of Christian life and its message has changed without the corge message itself changing.  Sustaining flexible, engaged, life filled Christian communities (as apart from increasing institutionalisation) is the way to go.  The Forge Summit did that.  I know that even if I am not personally engaged with The Forge people week by week, even though I am in a traditional church community, there are 499 others like me spread across the continent.  With faith, love and prayer we will impact our corner of the vineyard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve, love the concept of &#8220;engaged orthodoxy&#8221;.  This has it in a nutshell.  For myself, forget whether the emerging church is a movement or not.  Time will tell and others will have the say.  If the focus shifts to whether the emerging church is a &#8220;movement&#8221; the eye goes off the ball and turns inward &#8211; next thing it will be about how the movement should survive, etc ad nauseam.  500 people at the weekend was pretty wonderful &#8211; the goal should be to network and encourage those people who attended.  These are the leaven in the lump, the salt to give savour &#8211; these are the ones who can make the difference.  And if they do make the difference &#8211; well, how mindblowing is that.  Let&#8217;s not talk about where the world will be in a decade or two or three.  We don&#8217;t have much of a clue.  So much that has affected our loves in recent decades could not have been predicted and that which was indicated was unclear in its shape, form and impact.  Talk about getting it right and how we can sustain people and message in the changing dynamic is more to the point.  The concept of <span class="caps">DNA</span> transmission is vital.  As we look back over two millenia we can see how much the emphasis of Christian life and its message has changed without the corge message itself changing.  Sustaining flexible, engaged, life filled Christian communities (as apart from increasing institutionalisation) is the way to go.  The Forge Summit did that.  I know that even if I am not personally engaged with The Forge people week by week, even though I am in a traditional church community, there are 499 others like me spread across the continent.  With faith, love and prayer we will impact our corner of the vineyard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Subversive Influence &#187; Jesus wants His church back</title>
		<link>http://www.steveaddison.net/2005/06/29/notes-for-the-panel.html#comment-63</link>
		<dc:creator>Subversive Influence &#187; Jesus wants His church back</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jul 2005 03:56:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steveaddison.net/2005/06/25/notes-for-the-panel.html#comment-63</guid>
		<description>[...] Notes for a panel discussion to be held at an upcoming Forge Emerging Church Summit (HT: Signposts). The notes alone make some interesting reading and reflection stimulus &#8212; even if you&#8217;re not part of the panel discussion. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Notes for a panel discussion to be held at an upcoming Forge Emerging Church Summit (HT: Signposts). The notes alone make some interesting reading and reflection stimulus &#8212; even if you&#8217;re not part of the panel discussion. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.steveaddison.net/2005/06/29/notes-for-the-panel.html#comment-62</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jul 2005 10:30:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steveaddison.net/2005/06/25/notes-for-the-panel.html#comment-62</guid>
		<description>Why doesn't the last question interest me? I think questions like "Are we a new reformation?" are better left to history to decide. Others have tried to claim the New Reformation title only to be revealed as spirituality impotent. See my post on the suicide of liberal Christianity http://www.steveaddison.net/2005/04/11/the-suicide-of-liberal-christianity.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why doesn&#8217;t the last question interest me? I think questions like &#8220;Are we a new reformation?&#8221; are better left to history to decide. Others have tried to claim the New Reformation title only to be revealed as spirituality impotent. See my post on the suicide of liberal Christianity <a href="http://www.steveaddison.net/2005/04/11/the-suicide-of-liberal-christianity.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.steveaddison.net/2005/04/11/the-suicide-of-liberal-christianity.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trav</title>
		<link>http://www.steveaddison.net/2005/06/29/notes-for-the-panel.html#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator>Trav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2005 04:43:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steveaddison.net/2005/06/25/notes-for-the-panel.html#comment-61</guid>
		<description>Hey Steve...why doesn't the last question interest you</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Steve&#8230;why doesn&#8217;t the last question interest you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Forge panel on the future of the church</title>
		<link>http://www.steveaddison.net/2005/06/29/notes-for-the-panel.html#comment-59</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Forge panel on the future of the church</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2005 11:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steveaddison.net/2005/06/25/notes-for-the-panel.html#comment-59</guid>
		<description>[...]   29/6/2005	  	 Forge panel on the future of the church 	  	 			Steve Addison links up the questions  that I sent him to prepare for the panel I am faciliating at the forge [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]   29/6/2005   Forge panel on the future of the church    Steve Addison links up the questions  that I sent him to prepare for the panel I am faciliating at the forge [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
