<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jenkins on Why?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.steveaddison.net/2006/02/24/philip-jenkins-on-why.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.steveaddison.net/2006/02/24/philip-jenkins-on-why.html</link>
	<description>Steve Addison's blog about movements for the renewal and expansion of the church.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 02:31:33 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.steveaddison.net/2006/02/24/philip-jenkins-on-why.html#comment-396</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2006 08:24:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steveaddison.net/2006/02/24/philip-jenkins-on-why.html#comment-396</guid>
		<description>Phil, good point about the US. But I'm not sure the church there is still in a dynamic church planting phase. It was when the Methodists and Baptists captured the US frontier 1776-1850. They did so as outsiders who mobilized ordinary people. Pentecostalism also gave birth to a dynamic church planting movement. Again, those on the fringe tended to make the greatest contribution. The Southern Baptists continue to function as a church planting movement in the US and globally.

You're right. There are exceptions to the rule in the US and probably elsewhere. I still think there is a relationship. 

As Chinese society becomes more prosperous, and the church with it, will they be able to maintain their spiritual passion? I hope so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phil, good point about the US. But I&#8217;m not sure the church there is still in a dynamic church planting phase. It was when the Methodists and Baptists captured the US frontier 1776-1850. They did so as outsiders who mobilized ordinary people. Pentecostalism also gave birth to a dynamic church planting movement. Again, those on the fringe tended to make the greatest contribution. The Southern Baptists continue to function as a church planting movement in the US and globally.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re right. There are exceptions to the rule in the US and probably elsewhere. I still think there is a relationship.</p>
<p>As Chinese society becomes more prosperous, and the church with it, will they be able to maintain their spiritual passion? I hope so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.steveaddison.net/2006/02/24/philip-jenkins-on-why.html#comment-394</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2006 23:09:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steveaddison.net/2006/02/24/philip-jenkins-on-why.html#comment-394</guid>
		<description>Phil, you've got me thinking. Saturday morning in my world. I'm going to go and do some paving out the back while I ponder. . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phil, you&#8217;ve got me thinking. Saturday morning in my world. I&#8217;m going to go and do some paving out the back while I ponder. . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil</title>
		<link>http://www.steveaddison.net/2006/02/24/philip-jenkins-on-why.html#comment-393</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2006 22:58:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steveaddison.net/2006/02/24/philip-jenkins-on-why.html#comment-393</guid>
		<description>I love Jenkins and this book but isn't the United States a gigantic exception to his rule about Christianity flourishing only among the poor and persecuted?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love Jenkins and this book but isn&#8217;t the United States a gigantic exception to his rule about Christianity flourishing only among the poor and persecuted?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray</title>
		<link>http://www.steveaddison.net/2006/02/24/philip-jenkins-on-why.html#comment-392</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2006 22:54:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steveaddison.net/2006/02/24/philip-jenkins-on-why.html#comment-392</guid>
		<description>Without a doubt. No wonder it's such a lucid comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Without a doubt. No wonder it&#8217;s such a lucid comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.steveaddison.net/2006/02/24/philip-jenkins-on-why.html#comment-390</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2006 01:44:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steveaddison.net/2006/02/24/philip-jenkins-on-why.html#comment-390</guid>
		<description>I do believe it IS a Mac in the background! mmmmm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do believe it IS a Mac in the background! mmmmm</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
