<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why nobody likes Sydney Anglicans</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.steveaddison.net/2006/06/09/why-nobody-likes-sydney-anglicans.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.steveaddison.net/2006/06/09/why-nobody-likes-sydney-anglicans.html</link>
	<description>Steve Addison's blog about movements for the renewal and expansion of the church.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 10:35:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: More on the Australian census and those Sydney Anglicans &#187; Steve Addison&#8217;s blog Â» World Changers</title>
		<link>http://www.steveaddison.net/2006/06/09/why-nobody-likes-sydney-anglicans.html#comment-72591</link>
		<dc:creator>More on the Australian census and those Sydney Anglicans &#187; Steve Addison&#8217;s blog Â» World Changers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 06:14:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steveaddison.net/2007/06/02/why-nobody-likes-sydney-anglicans.html#comment-72591</guid>
		<description>[...] Commentators prefer to ignore the real reasons for the vitality of the Sydney diocese or to simply brand these Anglicans as fundamentalists. See: Why nobody likes the Sydney Anglicans. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Commentators prefer to ignore the real reasons for the vitality of the Sydney diocese or to simply brand these Anglicans as fundamentalists. See: Why nobody likes the Sydney Anglicans. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: More on the Australian census figures &#187; Steve Addison&#8217;s blog Â» World Changers</title>
		<link>http://www.steveaddison.net/2006/06/09/why-nobody-likes-sydney-anglicans.html#comment-69837</link>
		<dc:creator>More on the Australian census figures &#187; Steve Addison&#8217;s blog Â» World Changers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 01:12:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steveaddison.net/2007/06/02/why-nobody-likes-sydney-anglicans.html#comment-69837</guid>
		<description>[...] 61,185 in five years. From a movements perspective I would expect the evangelical Sydney Anglicans to be swimming against the tide of overall Anglican [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 61,185 in five years. From a movements perspective I would expect the evangelical Sydney Anglicans to be swimming against the tide of overall Anglican [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ranges Community Church &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Anglicanism&#8230;.</title>
		<link>http://www.steveaddison.net/2006/06/09/why-nobody-likes-sydney-anglicans.html#comment-1229</link>
		<dc:creator>Ranges Community Church &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Anglicanism&#8230;.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2006 03:19:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steveaddison.net/2007/06/02/why-nobody-likes-sydney-anglicans.html#comment-1229</guid>
		<description>[...] One of the things that I have observed is the struggle in defining what it means to be an anglican. Yet I think it misses the point &#8211; Archbishop Peter Jensen points out &#8216;The Anglican Communion is not our first loyalty- the Gospel is&#8216;. This is pretty encouraging because there is a breadth of expression which can take place within the scope of the Gospel, be it traditions of the early church fathers, old liturgy and prayers, church in a pub. It is a bit of a shame that Jensen who really defines himself with the traditional evangelical brush should be seen as a bit of a dirty word. I think evangelicalism has been too closely tied to American right wing politics, and the smell is filtering over to Australia. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] One of the things that I have observed is the struggle in defining what it means to be an anglican. Yet I think it misses the point &#8211; Archbishop Peter Jensen points out &#8216;The Anglican Communion is not our first loyalty- the Gospel is&#8216;. This is pretty encouraging because there is a breadth of expression which can take place within the scope of the Gospel, be it traditions of the early church fathers, old liturgy and prayers, church in a pub. It is a bit of a shame that Jensen who really defines himself with the traditional evangelical brush should be seen as a bit of a dirty word. I think evangelicalism has been too closely tied to American right wing politics, and the smell is filtering over to Australia. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
