» What about the church planting failures?

What about the church planting failures?

Istock 000002365450Small-1
The (NCLS) facts on church planting drew this comment from John Sumulo:

How do you interpret the above in relation to what appears to be an extremely high rate of church plant failures in the early years of a new church? I support church planting fully, but the rate of closures of new churches seems to suggest something isn’t quite right. And I wonder if the statistics above are of churches who make it past the early years, or those who don’t make it as well.
Good point. Yes the study doesn’t measure the church plants that have closed. Just those that are still running. Great question re planting “failures”. Here are a few thoughts.

Like you I keep hearing reports of the “extremely high rate of church plant failures.” Normally the rate of 80% is quoted. Here are a few examples:

“Chronicles of Church Planting: 80% failure rate” by Elizabeth D. Rios
“Increase your success rate in starting a new church by Jim Cowart
”Assessment process“ Acts 29
Churches think big by thinking small“, by Jane Lampman
”Denominations and Church Planting Networks“ by Steve McCoy

The last post drew this comment from James Paul:

Please help me with the 80% failure rate. We ar (sic) at 76% success and don’t like that, but everytime I get this I ask for research and documentation and can’t find anyone to give it to me.
I’m with you James. Where’s the evidence? I don’t think there is any. It may be 20%, it may be 90%. I just don’t think anyone has done the research. All we have is anecdotal evidence and our gut instinct.

But let’s assume it’s ”high“ whatever that means. How should we respond? Two thoughts come to mind.

1. Failure is an option

Who says ministry and mission are easy. History is full of ”failures“ that God used for His purposes. The Cross was a failure. Paul never led a mega church. William Carey was a failure. I’ve been a failure and shut a church plant down. It was a glorious defeat, and I was in the centre of God’s will—failing. I’ve never been the same since.

God used the experience to break the nexus between my identity and my ministry. I had to face the reality that lack of success in ministry was tearing me apart. I was called but I was also driven. Today I’m a free man in Christ because he led me from a church planting success into a church planting failure. In that place of defeat I discovered the all sufficiency of Christ.

Sporting teams fail, businesses fail, explorers fail, artists fail. Just think of those who have gone before us—martyrdom, poverty, disease. Have a read of Hebrews 11. Failure is an option. Ministry is a tough assignment. Life is even tougher. But God is good and nothing is wasted.

2. Failure is about leadership

The most strategic thing you can do to dramatically reduce the number of unsuccessful church plants is to screen the candidates. I know denominations and churches that have blown hundreds of thousands of dollars in unfruitful subsidies because they were unwilling to implement a strategy to effectively interview candidates.

There’s plenty more to say on this question of leadership, but I’ve already said it:

Blaming the church planter
Why church plants fail: Todd Hunter
Why church plants succeed: Todd Hunter
Characteristics of effective church planters
Church planting lessons from the Southern Baptists

Church planting is still the most effective form of evangelism under the sun. We need to have the courage to grow, recruit and deploy pioneering leaders all over the place. Even with the best systems there will be a price to pay. It’s the same price others have paid to get the gospel to us. It’s the price of following Christ and the rewards are out of this world.

Finally, a word of advice to potential church planters: be sure of your calling, get a good assessment done, get a good coach, hang on for the ride and find God in the mess of life and ministry.

10 Responses to “What about the church planting failures?” »»

  1. Comment by John Smulo | 12/12/06 at 3:14 pm

    Steve,

    Thanks for the follow up post. I believe passionately in church planting and church planters. But I also believe we need to take the failure rate—whatever it is—seriously and work hard on thinking through why planters don’t always make it.

    As a lead pastor/church planter that was a part of a failed plant, I know from experience the huge impact this can have, not only on myself and my family, but those who were involved.

    I’ve been interested in how many church planters have experienced great difficulties in their first plant or two, and then had a lot of success after this. So maybe it’s learning the hard way, maybe God preparing the person for future planting experiences, maybe, maybe?

  2. Comment by Steve | 12/12/06 at 6:23 pm

    John, I think you’re right. We have to keep moving forward in mission but work hard at the support systems and at helping people discern their readiness for church planting. I made it through our ‘failed’ church plant because I had a coach-mentor in Terry Walling who helped see how God was using the experience.

    Appreciate your input.

  3. Comment by GuyMuse | 12/13/06 at 1:29 am

    I have posted our own reasons for high church planting failure here. It is indeed frustrating to see so much of our effort end in apparent failure, but then again, HE is Lord of the Harvest, not us. We have to believe that the Lord has all these matters under His watchful eye. I just wish we were wiser and could understand some of the reasons for church plants not working out.

  4. Comment by Keith in Nevada | 12/18/06 at 1:59 am

    Maybe a megachurch is a failure. Based on a very interesting section in the book “The Tipping Point” we might think of limiting churches to about 150 people, above which community begins to fail and they become merely organizations. A worthwhile book to read with what I think is a very important insight into social structures.

  5. Comment by Keith in Nevada | 12/18/06 at 1:36 pm

    I am a spectator to Church planting even though I have a degree in missions. I work as a professional in the mining industry. However, the further I go along in my walk with Christ the more I see prayer as central to God’s work and my own life. I would be interested in anyone’s descriptions of the prayer life of the church plants that failed.

    The church I attend is not especially spirit led in the sense of people calling upon the Lord and waiting upon Him for his direction. Elder meetings are more like business meetings and mission committee meetings do not emphasize prayer so much as allocation of funds and the latest current events. Etc. for other activities of the church.

    As I have interceded for my church the Lord has continually brought me back to the truth that my Church lacks power not because the elders are failing to do this or that; not because the congregants ought to be doing this or that, and are not; not because we lack this or that program; but because corporately we are not calling upon God. In short I see the Holy Spirit leading me to pray relentlessly for His power to be at work among us, leading to brokeness, repentance, and His will being done among us as we call upon Him. I do not exclude myself from culpability in the failure of His power to be at work among us, so it has been a humbling road to say the least.

    So my question to anyone that wants to answer is this: When church plants fail, what was the prayer life of those churches like?

  6. Comment by Steve | 12/18/06 at 1:50 pm

    Keith, re church size and “failure”: NCD findings reveal that larger churches have their challenges in both reaching new people and mobilizing existing members for ministry. But I’m reluctant to say a church has failed just on the basis of size. Large or small.

    I like Tim Keller’s approach:

    A. Every church has a “size culture,” which must be accepted.
    B. Every church has aspects of its natural size culture, which must be resisted.
    C. There is no “best size” for a church.

    http://www.redeemer2.com/themovement/issues/2006/fall/church_size_dynamics.html

  7. Comment by Steve | 12/18/06 at 1:55 pm

    Keith, re the link between lack of prayer and church planting failure: We had to close our second church plant despite an even stronger commitment from the start to prayer and fasting and God’s refining work in our lives. It’s a long story but I don’t think prayer alone can guarantee a viable church plant.

    I think the NCD paradigm of eight interrelated health indicators reminds us that God wants loving relationships in the church as much as he wants passionate spirituality. He wants empowering leadership as much as he wants a people mobilized according to their spiritual gifts. Prayer is key but health is not one dimensional.

  8. Comment by Keith in Nevada | 12/18/06 at 2:06 pm

    I was being a bit tongue in cheek when saying perhaps megachurches are failures. I don’t really think that is the case, however, the points made in The Tipping Point about dynamics up to the 150 mark are suggestive to say the least, and I have not seen engagement with that concept, although admittedly I don’t move much in circles where I would see it.

    Good point that Church health is not one-dimensional. That will need some digesting. I’ll have to find the NCD paradigm and give it some thought. For now, my leading from the Lord for prayer is clear. Perhaps He will clarify it through further study. Thanks for your comments.

    K in NV

Trackbacks/Pingbacks »»>

  1. Pingback by ‘Parent’ Churches are Healthier! | 02/12/07 at 6:32 am

    [...] are some facts! Church plants do fail (check out Why church plants fail? and share your comments) – but [...]

  2. [...] See: What about the church planting failures? [...]


Leave a Reply »»

Google
  Web   SteveAddison.net
Subscribe with My Yahoo! Subscribe in NewsGator Online Subscribe with Bloglines