http://www.steveaddison.net/2007/04/13/rick-warren-v-sam-davis.html Steve Addison's blog about movements for the renewal and expansion of the church. Mon, 01 Dec 2008 20:12:45 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5 http://www.steveaddison.net/2007/04/13/rick-warren-v-sam-davis.html#comment-41132 cyboman Fri, 13 Apr 2007 07:36:29 +0000 http://www.steveaddison.net/2007/04/13/rick-warren-v-sam-davis.html#comment-41132 I'm not Sam Harris actually. And even if I were, why do we have to disagree about anything. Isn't the point of discussing things on a blog supposed to make one more aware of things; and not complacent with the knowledge you already have. I’m not Sam Harris actually. And even if I were, why do we have to disagree about anything. Isn’t the point of discussing things on a blog supposed to make one more aware of things; and not complacent with the knowledge you already have.

]]> http://www.steveaddison.net/2007/04/13/rick-warren-v-sam-davis.html#comment-41131 Steve Fri, 13 Apr 2007 07:30:02 +0000 http://www.steveaddison.net/2007/04/13/rick-warren-v-sam-davis.html#comment-41131 Sam, thanks for visiting. My apologies for not getting your name right. I'll make sure to fix it. Good point on my throw away line re God and atheists. I appreciate your passion for your cause even though we'll have to disagree on something as important as the existence of God and His unique revelation through Jesus. Sam, thanks for visiting. My apologies for not getting your name right. I’ll make sure to fix it. Good point on my throw away line re God and atheists. I appreciate your passion for your cause even though we’ll have to disagree on something as important as the existence of God and His unique revelation through Jesus.

]]> http://www.steveaddison.net/2007/04/13/rick-warren-v-sam-davis.html#comment-41130 cyboman Fri, 13 Apr 2007 07:13:23 +0000 http://www.steveaddison.net/2007/04/13/rick-warren-v-sam-davis.html#comment-41130 Firstly, the name is "Sam Harris" not "Sam Davis". Secondly, what on earth does it mean for an omniscient being to not believe in millions of its supposed creations. Why not provide a counter-argument against Harris's critique instead of merely saying something that doesn't make any sense. Firstly, the name is “Sam Harris” not “Sam Davis”. Secondly, what on earth does it mean for an omniscient being to not believe in millions of its supposed creations. Why not provide a counter-argument against Harris’s critique instead of merely saying something that doesn’t make any sense.

]]>